LINKS: Due Process
DEPT. OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS
PROGRAM, QUALITY, ASSURANCE
MEDIATION
BSEA RULES
STATE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING PROCEDURES: 801 CMR 1.0
MASS. STATE SPED LAW 603 CMR 28.00
I.D.E.A. FEDERAL SPED LAW
504 LAWS FEDERAL
504 LAWS STATE
STUDENT RECORDS LAW:
STATE: 603 CMR 23.00
FEDERAL: 34 CFR 99.00
IEP FORMS
FEDERAL REGULATIONS:
FAPE: FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION
PROHIBITION ON MANDATORY MEDICATION
IEP CONTENT
IEP TEAM
PARENT PARTICIPATION
IEP'S MUST BE IN EFFECT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND REVISION OF IEP
DEFINITION OF CONSENT
PARENTAL CONSENT
EVALUATIONS PROCESS
EVALUATIONS PROCEDURES
BUREAU OF SPECIAL EDUCATION APPEALS
PROGRAM, QUALITY, ASSURANCE
MEDIATION
BSEA RULES
STATE ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING PROCEDURES: 801 CMR 1.0
MASS. STATE SPED LAW 603 CMR 28.00
I.D.E.A. FEDERAL SPED LAW
504 LAWS FEDERAL
504 LAWS STATE
STUDENT RECORDS LAW:
STATE: 603 CMR 23.00
FEDERAL: 34 CFR 99.00
IEP FORMS
FEDERAL REGULATIONS:
FAPE: FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION
PROHIBITION ON MANDATORY MEDICATION
IEP CONTENT
IEP TEAM
PARENT PARTICIPATION
IEP'S MUST BE IN EFFECT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND REVISION OF IEP
DEFINITION OF CONSENT
PARENTAL CONSENT
EVALUATIONS PROCESS
EVALUATIONS PROCEDURES
AFFILIATES:
MICHAEL TURNER, ATTORNEY
DR. GERALDINE CASSENS,
Ph.D. Neuropsychologist
ERIN MCLOUGHLIN Ed. S., BCBA
AUTISM: STATE RESOURCES
DR. GERALDINE CASSENS,
Ph.D. Neuropsychologist
ERIN MCLOUGHLIN Ed. S., BCBA
AUTISM: STATE RESOURCES
FYI: A MUST READ
BSEA HEARING OFFICER'S EMPLOYEES OF THE DESE
JUNE 1, 2009 LETTER TO OSEP FROM DESE COMMISSIONER, NOT COMPLYING WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS
JULY 1, 2009, LETTER FROM OSEP
SCHOOL DISTRICTS PREVAIL AT HEARINGS AT ALARMINGLY HIGH RATES, CONSEQUENTLY, PARENT'S PREVAIL AT EMBARRASSING LOW RATES, YEAR AFTER YEAR AND IN MOST CASES WITH AN ATTORNEY. (SEE STATS BELOW)
2010 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
2009 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
2008 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
2007 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
2006 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
2005 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
THIS IS WHY THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS DON'T CARE IF THEY VIOLATE STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. 90% OF THE TIME, THEY WIN.... GO FIGURE. THE HEARING OFFICERS DURING THE ENTIRE TIME WERE EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE, WHICH IS A VIOLATION OF 34 CFR 300.511
JUNE 1, 2009 LETTER TO OSEP FROM DESE COMMISSIONER, NOT COMPLYING WITH FEDERAL REGULATIONS
JULY 1, 2009, LETTER FROM OSEP
SCHOOL DISTRICTS PREVAIL AT HEARINGS AT ALARMINGLY HIGH RATES, CONSEQUENTLY, PARENT'S PREVAIL AT EMBARRASSING LOW RATES, YEAR AFTER YEAR AND IN MOST CASES WITH AN ATTORNEY. (SEE STATS BELOW)
2010 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
2009 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
2008 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
2007 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
2006 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
2005 BSEA STATISTICS ON HEARING RESULTS
THIS IS WHY THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS DON'T CARE IF THEY VIOLATE STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. 90% OF THE TIME, THEY WIN.... GO FIGURE. THE HEARING OFFICERS DURING THE ENTIRE TIME WERE EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE, WHICH IS A VIOLATION OF 34 CFR 300.511